8 Petrarch’s source is Pliny, Historia naturalia, tr. W.H.S. Jones (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1963), Book 29, 1-8; Petrarch makes repeated use of Pliny, see especially, the Invective, henceforth cited as ICM, I, 828; II, 868, 872; III, 912.
9 The classification of medicine as verso mechanical art can be found in Hugh of St. 11; Petrarch refers to medicine as verso mechanical art also per XII, 2, 454, 466, 473-4.
10 Fracassetti, Lettere della vecchiaia, vol. 2, 242-3, translates verso passage not found sopra Bernardo’s edition: “Ecco volubilita di impiego, quasi anche inutilita della rimedio,” XII, 2.
The continuing popularity of the Conciliator is attested by per seventeenth-century compendio, Conciliator enucleatus seu differentiarum philosophicarum et medicarum petri apponensis Compendium, Gregori Lorsti, acad
11 Peirce, “How sicuro Make Our Ideas Clear,” Writings, vol. 3, 263-4: “The bath of a belief is the establishment of per habit, and different beliefs are distinguished by the different modes of action sicuro which they give rise.”
V. Nutton remarks that per good manuscript of Galen’s works was available at the papal athletique sopra 1353, John Caius and the Manuscripts of Galen, (Cambridge: Cambridge Philological Society, 1987), vol
12 On Petrarch and the dialecticians see Pietro Paolo Gerosa, Umanesimo fedele del Petrarca; Dono divino agostiniana, attinenze medievali (Turin: Bottega d’Erasmo, 1966), 208f. 13. Petrarch seems to collapse dialectic and logic; on this issue see Eleonore Stump, Dialectic and its Place in the Development of Medieval Logic (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1989).
14 Petrarch is not above employing syllogizing, per deepest irony, of course; see ICM, III, 932: “Certe ego nunc risu et verecundia impedior sillogismum tibi tuo parem mittere, quo probem te vilissime servum rei. Quod urbanius possum dicam: si quod alio spectat, et ad aliud refertur, et propter aliud est inventum, illi serviat oportet, ut manque vis. Antidoto autem tua pecumian spectat et ad illam refertur et propter illam est. Conclude, dyaletice: pertanto pecunie schiava est.”
15 Petrarch also argues that the more necessary is not by that more noble: “Igitur putas necessitas artium nobilitatem arguat. Contra oriente; alioquin nobilissimus artificum erit agricola; sutor quoque et pistor et deguise, sinon mactare desieris, durante precio eritis,” ICM, III, 894-6; cf. III, 910.
16 “. . . the doctor had done nothing at all, nor could he have except what per loquacious dialectician, rich sopra boredom and lacking per remedies, can do”; “Medicum nil omnino vel fecisse, vel facere potuisse, nisi quod dialecticus loquax potest, taedii dives, inopsque remedii.”
18 I use the edition, Conciliator controversarium quae inter philosophos eet medicos versantur (Venice: apud Juntas, 1548). Nancy Siraisi’s discussion of d’Abano con Arts and Sciences at Padua; The Studium of Padua before 1350 (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies, 1973), is excellent. D’Abano libretto the attack on him as Averroist by the Dominicans in Differentia 48; Nardi contests the notion of d’Abano as Averroist sopra “La credenza dell’anima di nuovo la epoca delle forme conformemente Pietro d’Abano,” 1-17, and “Circa alle dottrine filosofiche di Pietro d’Abano,” mediante Studi sulla dottrina aristotelica nel Veneto, I: Saggi sull’Aristotelismo padovano dal https://datingranking.net/it/muzmatch-review/ eta XIV at XVI (Florence: Sansoni, 1958), 19-74. P. Oppure. Kristeller makes the point that Petrarch’s opponents per the De sui ipsius et multorum ignorantia were probably Bolognese, not Paduans, mediante “Petrarch’s ‘Averroists’; Per Note on the History of Aristotelianism per Venice, Padua, and Bologna,” Bibliotheque d’Humanisme et Renaissance, 14 (1952), 59-65. Giessena (Giessae: Casparus Chemlinus, 1621).
19 Lynn Thorndike, “Translations from the Greek by Pietro d’Abano,” Isis, 33 (1942), 649-53; see also V. Nutton, “Galen on Prognosis,” Campione medicorum graecorum, 8.1.1 (1979), 27.
21 See the argument cited mediante Differentia 3, (8r): “. . . medicari non levante scientia fortuite: sed quidam actus et labor particularis, et de tali nulla levante scientia . . . regulat in actu operandi particularem et tunc consequitor medicinae finis perfecte, quod ostenditur.”