Investigation have been analysed playing with SPSS 25.0. First detailed analyses was indeed sexy sexy sexy guapa mujer negra performed, together with Cronbach’s alphas and frequencies. Digital logistic regressions were used to evaluate relationships anywhere between intercourse, decades, intimate direction, having a romantic/sexual companion, SNS used, sexting normalisation and you can readiness to engage in sexting due to the fact independent details, in addition to five sexting habits once the established parameters. Nagelkerke’s Roentgen dos is actually considered as a way of measuring feeling dimensions. The parameters was in fact inserted with the design additionally. The research has also been stratified by the sex.
Prevalence out of sexting habits
The most typical sexting habits are becoming (21.2%) and obtaining thru an intermediary (twenty eight.4%), with 3rd-group forwarding regarding intimate blogs (nine.3%) and you will, lastly, sending (8.1%). Descriptive statistics are offered within the Dining table dos.
The new regression models have been significant. Nagelkerke’s R dos is actually .42 toward “sending” design, .29 with the “receiving” design, .23 to the “third-group forwarding” model, and .17 towards the “receiving thru an intermediary” design (Dining table step 3:
From the “sending” design, determination to help you sext (OR: 8.26; 95% depend on interval [CI]: 5.36-), which have a romantic/intimate spouse (OR: 3.44; 95% CI: dos.25-5.25), having fun with Snapchat (OR: step one.87; 95% CI: step 1.19-2.93), sexual positioning (OR: step 1.77; 95% CI: 1.04-step 3.00) and you can years (OR: step one.36; 95% CI: step 1.14-step 1.63) was in fact somewhat associated with giving involvement. In the “receiving” model, which have a romantic/sexual companion (OR: 3.27; 95% CI: dos.51-cuatro.28), determination to help you sext (OR: dos.79; 95% CI: 2.01-3.89), having fun with Instagram (OR: 1.89; 95% CI: 1.16-step three.10), sex (OR: step one.82; 95% CI: 1.37-2.41), playing with Snapchat (OR: 1.6step one; 95% CI: step one.21-dos.14), sexting normalisation (OR: step one.49; 95% CI: 1.20-step one.86) and you will decades (OR: step 1.26; 95% CI: step 1.step 12-1.41) were significantly associated with researching involvement.
On the “third-group forwarding” design, playing with Instagram (OR: dos.74; 95% CI: step 1.1six-six.51), desire in order to sext (OR: 2.00; 95% CI: 1.48-dos.72), gender (OR: step 1.96; 95% CI: step one.32-dos.91), having an intimate/intimate partner (OR: step one.86; 95% CI: step 1.29-2.68), using Myspace (OR: step 1.53; 95% CI: 1.03-2.26), sexting normalisation (OR: 1.43; 95% CI: 1.09-step one.87) and you may age (OR: step one.43; 95% CI: step one.22-step 1.66) was basically somewhat connected with wedding into the 3rd-people forwarding.
Throughout the “receiving thru an intermediary” model, using Instagram (OR: dos.step 16; 95% CI: step one.47-3.19), sexting normalisation (OR: step one.84; 95% CI: step 1.5dos-2.24), which have an intimate/intimate companion (OR: step 1.71; 95% CI: step 1.35-2.17), intercourse (OR: step 1.41; 95% CI: step one.step 1step 1-step 1.80) and you can decades (OR: 1.36; 95% CI: 1.23-step 1.49) was in fact somewhat linked to involvement inside researching through a mediator.
Intercourse distinctions
The fresh regression patterns was indeed significant. Nagelkerke’s R 2 are .fifty for females and you may .41 to own men toward “sending” model; .31 for females and .29 to have boys into the “receiving” model; .18 for females and .24 for people for the “third-cluster forwarding” model; and you will .14 for girls and you can .twenty-two to have men on “receiving through a mediator” design (Desk cuatro:
From the “sending” model, for girls, readiness so you’re able to sext (OR: ; 95% CI: -), which have an enchanting/intimate companion (OR: cuatro.54; 95% CI: 2.27-nine.09) and you will years (OR: step one.60; 95% CI: step one.17-2.20) was basically rather about sending wedding. For males, they certainly were determination in order to sext (OR: six.05; 95% CI: 3.68-9.94), that have a romantic/sexual lover (OR: dos.79; 95% CI: step one.59-cuatro.88) and utilizing Snapchat (OR: 2.38; 95% CI: 1.32-cuatro.29).
Regarding the “receiving” design, for girls, readiness so you’re able to sext (OR: 5.11; 95% CI: 2.57-), using Instagram (OR: cuatro.34; 95% CI: step 1.43-), having an enchanting/intimate mate (OR: step 3.77; 95% CI: dos.49-5.72), sexting normalisation (OR: step 1.62; 95% CI: 1.13-2.33) and ages (OR: 1.42; 95% CI: 1.step 17-step 1.72) was rather regarding searching engagement. To possess men, they certainly were with an intimate/intimate partner (OR: dos.97; 95% CI: 2.08-cuatro.25), desire so you’re able to sext (OR: 2.32; 95% CI: 1.58-step three.41), playing with Snapchat (OR: 2.03; 95% CI: 1.38-2.91), sexting normalisation (OR: 1.40; 95% CI: step one.06-step one.86) and years (OR: step 1.20; 95% CI: step 1.04-step one.38).