Analysis were analysed using SPSS twenty-five.0. Very first detailed analyses was did, and Cronbach’s alphas and you will frequencies. Digital logistic regressions were used to evaluate associations ranging from gender, ages, intimate orientation, with a romantic/intimate mate, SNS made use of, sexting normalisation and you will readiness to take part in sexting as independent parameters, and also the five sexting behaviours because created details. Nagelkerke’s Roentgen 2 try regarded as a measure of feeling size. Most of the parameters have been joined towards design likewise. The analysis was also stratified because of the intercourse.
Prevalence of sexting behaviours
The most common sexting habits are getting (21.2%) and having through an intermediary (28.4%), followed by third-group forwarding from intimate stuff (nine.3%) and you may, lastly, delivering (8.1%). Descriptive statistics are shown from inside the Desk 2.
The brand new regression designs was in fact significant. Nagelkerke’s R dos are .42 to your “sending” model, .29 into “receiving” model, .23 to the “third-team forwarding” model, and .17 on the “searching thru an intermediary” design (Table 3:
About “sending” model, willingness in order to sext (OR: 8.26; 95% depend on interval [CI]: 5.36-), which have an enchanting/sexual mate (OR: step 3.44; 95% CI: dos.25-5.25), playing with Snapchat (OR: step one.87; 95% CI: 1.19-dos.93), intimate orientation (OR: 1.77; 95% CI: step 1.04-step 3.00) and you will decades (OR: 1.36; 95% CI: 1.step one4-step one.63) was in fact notably related to sending engagement. About “receiving” model, having a romantic/intimate companion (OR: 3.27; 95% CI: 2.51-4.28), desire in order to sext (OR: 2.79; 95% CI: dos.01-3.89), playing with Instagram (OR: step one.89; 95% CI: step one.16-3.10), sex (OR: 1.82; 95% CI: step 1.37-2.41), having fun with Snapchat (OR: step one.6step one; 95% CI: 1 chicas americanas calientes JaponГ©s.dos1-dos.14), sexting normalisation (OR: step one.49; 95% CI: step 1.20-step 1.86) and you may age (OR: step 1.26; 95% CI: step one.step one2-step one.41) were rather associated with researching engagement.
On “third-cluster forwarding” design, using Instagram (OR: 2.74; 95% CI: step one.16-6.51), determination to sext (OR: 2.00; 95% CI: step one.48-2.72), intercourse (OR: step 1.96; 95% CI: 1.3dos-2.91), with an enchanting/sexual partner (OR: step 1.86; 95% CI: step 1.29-dos.68), playing with Fb (OR: step 1.53; 95% CI: step one.03-dos.26), sexting normalisation (OR: step 1.43; 95% CI: 1.09-1.87) and ages (OR: 1.43; 95% CI: 1.22-step 1.66) was basically significantly regarding involvement when you look at the third-party forwarding.
From the “researching through a mediator” design, using Instagram (OR: 2.16; 95% CI: 1.47-step three.19), sexting normalisation (OR: 1.84; 95% CI: step one.52-2.24), which have an intimate/sexual companion (OR: step 1.71; 95% CI: step one.35-2.17), intercourse (OR: step one.41; 95% CI: 1.step onestep 1-step 1.80) and age (OR: step 1.36; 95% CI: step one.23-step one.49) was in fact rather associated with engagement for the acquiring through an intermediary.
Intercourse variations
This new regression patterns was indeed tall. Nagelkerke’s R dos is .50 for women and you can .41 getting guys on “sending” model; .31 for women and you can .29 to own boys towards the “receiving” model; .18 for women and .twenty four for boys towards the “third-team forwarding” model; and .fourteen for females and you can .twenty-two to have guys towards the “researching thru a mediator” design (Dining table 4:
On the “sending” model, for females, readiness to sext (OR: ; 95% CI: -), with an intimate/sexual companion (OR: cuatro.54; 95% CI: dos.27-9.09) and ages (OR: 1.60; 95% CI: step 1.17-2.20) was in fact rather related to sending wedding. To possess boys, these people were desire to sext (OR: six.05; 95% CI: 3.68-9.94), with an enchanting/sexual partner (OR: 2.79; 95% CI: 1.59-4.88) and utilizing Snapchat (OR: 2.38; 95% CI: step one.32-4.29).
Regarding the “receiving” model, for females, willingness to sext (OR: 5.11; 95% CI: dos.57-), using Instagram (OR: cuatro.34; 95% CI: 1.43-), which have a romantic/sexual mate (OR: 3.77; 95% CI: dos.49-5.72), sexting normalisation (OR: 1.62; 95% CI: step one.13-dos.33) and years (OR: 1.42; 95% CI: step one.step one7-step one.72) were somewhat about finding engagement. To possess boys, they were having an intimate/intimate spouse (OR: 2.97; 95% CI: 2.08-cuatro.25), desire to help you sext (OR: 2.32; 95% CI: step 1.58-3.41), having fun with Snapchat (OR: dos.03; 95% CI: step one.38-dos.91), sexting normalisation (OR: step one.40; 95% CI: 1.06-1.86) and you may ages (OR: step 1.20; 95% CI: 1.04-step 1.38).